Introducing Shed Journalism. Something you never want to do

At the Society of Editors seminar in the Midlands on Monday, Liverpool Echo editor Alastair Machray was one of a number of editors to answer the question: “Is sport still important?”

Actually, Ali also answered the question: “How we will make sure we’re important to fans?” as well, because the actual title of the session could be answered in sentences containing one word, or just three letters.

The challenge for the regional media, however, is simple: Lots of people think they can do sport now, and by sport I generally mean professional football. Some do it very well – football clubs for example, and some blogs – others don’t

So where does the regional media fit in? Ali pointed to the fact the Liverpool Echo is the only media to get 30 minutes a day with both Everton boss Roberto Martinez and LFC boss Brendan Rodgers. It’s what sets the Echo’s writers apart from the ‘men in their sheds’ bashing out content on LFC and EFC without ever going to the football ground, let alone grill the manager on what’s happening.

That doesn’t mean if you’re on not on such good terms with the football manager, you’re  a man in a shed. Indeed, Ali was at pains to say the Echo isn’t in the pocket of the clubs – fans of both clubs would be very vocal about that if they thought the title was. The Echo appears to be in lucky – and rare – territory: it has clubs which appreciate the importance of the local title, but don’t seek to regulate what it does and doesn’t write.

So Shed Journalist – as I’ll call him or her now – is someone every journalist should avoid being. To me, being a journalistic Shed Man is basically about publishing stuff because you can. I can, therefore I am if you see what I mean. Shed Man does it without connections into a wider community of people who can inform and shape what you do.

There are lots of such sports sites out there, churning out content just for audience, knowing that their success hangs on getting something out on NewsNow at just the right time. The audience is passing through, not coming to you specifically. It feels lonely, a bit like being in a shed, I guess.

Journalism is increasingly about connections with readers and engagement with them too. For the Echo, sports coverage is defined by having the inside track at the football clubs, but the confidence to call things straight when it needs to. At the Newcastle Chronicle, it’s a different picture – the club banned writers from the Newcastle titles over coverage of an anti-owner protest march.

That’s given the Chronicle especially a closer tie with the fan community, and the freedom to write without fear of punishment from the club at a time when most fans want the owner – and increasingly the manager – out.

In Portsmouth, The News was always being threatened with being banned when Pompey were big time. Now they’re not and the paper is more connected to fans than ever before – thanks in part to resurrecting the Saturday Sports Mail and donating 10p a copy to the fans organisation which now runs the club.

The whole point of a shed is to have the ability to lock yourself away from the world if you want to, and that’s the last thing journalists can allow themselves to do, even if some have been prone in the past at doing just that.  The ability to connect with people, and make people think of us, is what separates ‘shed journalism’ from real journalism.

There will be some who would construe the idea of shed man as an attempt by me as a professional journalist to belittle the attempts of those who aren’t lucky enough to be paid to be journalists, or who write and don’t see themselves as journalists at all. Honestly, I’m not trying to do that.

I’ve seen hyperlocal sites crop up with active editors who are all over their community, turning some journalists at established brands into ‘shed men’ – at best, not as connected to their communities as the new hyperlocal sites are.

The internet has been a very honest assessor of just how connected the many parts of our newspapers are to the communities they serve. Subjects we would consider essential to a daily newspaper often look a lot different under the microscope of audience analytics.

In the weeks, months and years to come journalism will increasingly be measured by its ability to engage, its ability to make people think ‘If I want to know about this, I have to go there’. That’s the key to success, and it depends on making sure we never become Shed Man. You can get page views and unique users without talking to the audience, the hard work comes from convincing them to find you, not the other way round. And you’re a lot harder to find in the shed.

* * *

PS: Just to be clear, I like sheds, but to make this post work I’ve had to take Ali’s lead. I’d much rather have talked about greenhouses. I have a real problem with them. If you like sheds, I’d point you in the direction of Andrew Wilcox, a colleague of mine who knows all about building communities around sheds.

2 comments

  1. David,
    Thanks for the article. I do not agree that fans or anyone else is the man in the shed writing. I think this perpetuates, in a subtle way, the bias against the free press truly understood. The free press exists again because anyone anywhere can publish what they want. (Within legal reason although this is no different in many ways than 17th century England, as Macauley’s History of England shows so well).

    The challenge or opportunity of sports journalism is that it is now open to the talented amateur or the enthusiastic fan. In the US, yahoo has encouraged or recruited amateurs to blog about their teams. These are bloggers who already wrote about their teams in their own time and Yahoo sports is tapping into that enthusiasm and audience.

    I would have thought that editors would see this as a way to leverage their brand, and expand their audience base. At the same time, they could offer this guest blog on a revolving basis to see people compete to be featured as well as encourage talent and approaches that the individual blogger might not consider, such as length, nuance, and structure. At the same time, the regional paper then provides its contacts to the blogger who is providing an insight into a local community where they write (physically and virtually).

    I would be surprised to see an active local blogger, who writes on a community based issue (either physical or digital) as a shed and cut off from the community. I write for a number of communities and I have contacts within those communities based on my interests and what I write, yet for the purposes of your article, albeit taking someone else’s lead, I would be consider the man in the shed. I have only met a few of my community in person, usually twice as nice in person, but I have met a lot more virtually and would exchange information and contacts as necessary.

    I do not have access to a football manager or a minister, but I am certain that within that community there is a connection to those people if necessary. I am also pretty certain that some of the material I have written has been circulated more widely than my audience and read by an audience that would normally be beyond my community for the simple reason that the content matters more, in the end, than the contacts. Too many journalists have maintained a reputation based on contacts when their content does not support their reputation, which can be seen most dramatically in the low numbers of followers for editors and other people who are important figures because of their “contacts” but their content is unimpressive.

    Thanks again for a stimulating article.

    1. Hello,
      I agree. I think a ‘shed journalist’ is a trait rather than where you are working. In a shed, you can lock yourself off from the world, and therefore not be connected with the audience and just focus on stats such as page views. That’s a risk which faces all journalists. The fact anyone can be a publisher now is a good thing – but those who do it best will be those with a special connection, be it with their subject matter or their audience, or, ideally, both.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s